Realme’s new phone seen on Geekbench, may launch soon

Highlights:

  • Reality’s new phone shows on benchmarking site Geekbench
  • The model number of this new phone of the company is RMX3085
  • The phone can come with 8 GB RAM and Android 11 OS

new Delhi
Realme A new phone of has been seen in the database of benchmarking website Geekbench. The model number of this handset is RMX3085. The handset has also previously been seen on Malaysia’s TKDN and Europe’s EEC certification website. The Geekbench listing shows that the company is testing internally before launching this phone.

MediaTek processor can be found
According to the Geekbench listing, this Realme phone will come with a MediaTek octa-core processor with a base frequency of 2.0GHz. The SoC mentioned with MT6785V / CD appears to be the MediaTek Helio G95. SoC is 8 GB RAM and works on Android 11 OS. The phone received 536 points in Geekbench’s single-core testing and 1702 points in multi-core testing.

Realme X7 Pro vs OnePlus Nord: Which 5G smartphone better in a budget of up to 30 thousand?

Will have to wait for specifications
There is currently no information about which specifications the RMX3085 will come with. Talking about chipset, this is the same processor that the company offers in Realme 7 and Realme Narjo 20 Pro. It is expected that more information related to this phone will be revealed in the coming days.

Samsung Galaxy M12 launched with 6000 mAh battery and quad rear camera, know all the features

Reality V11 5G launched
Realme has launched its new smartphone Realme V11 5G in China. This is Reality’s first smartphone that comes with the Dimensity 700 chipset. The phone has a 6.52-inch HD + IPS LCD. The phone is equipped with up to 6 GB of RAM and up to 128 GB of internal storage. For photography, it has a 13-megapixel + 2-megapixel dual rear camera setup. At the same time, an 8-megapixel camera has been given in this phone for selfie. To power the phone, it has a 5000mAh battery, which supports 18 Watt fast charging.

in hindi

Leave a Reply